Share
Commentary

Watch: Biden's Performance Was So Bad, People Started to Wonder if He Hallucinated Audience During Debate

Share

“I really don’t know what he said at the end of that sentence. I don’t think he knows what he said, either.”

With those words, Donald Trump effectively ended the first presidential debate — and the entirety of the debate regarding President Joe Biden’s mental fitness, really — with a TKO, literally before the 90-minute contest hit the half-hour mark.

The only question that remained, for those of us who kept watching like NASCAR viewers who don’t like auto racing but want to see if there are going to be any serious wrecks involved, is how bad things got.

Trending:
Jill Tries Rallying Donors but Accidentally Sets up Several Humiliating Lines About Joe

The answer: So bad that people were literally wondering whether or not the president of these United States of America was hallucinating a studio audience.

The answer to that: Probably not. But, if you were watching all 90 minutes of that disaster for democracy, could you really be so sure?

The most glaring moment came as President Biden delivered his final remarks, which were a rambling farrago of talking points not assembled into any particular sensical order. It wasn’t a summation so much as an ejection of unconnected thoughts that presumably had focus-grouped well among Democratic voters.

It began with talk of former President Donald Trump’s tax policies: “We find ourselves in a situation where, number one, we have to make sure that we have a fair tax system,” he said, according to a transcript. “I ask anyone out there in the audience, or anyone out watching this debate, do you think the tax system is fair?

Is Joe Biden mentally fit?

“The fact is that I said, nobody even making under $400,000 had a single penny increasing their taxes, and it will not. And if I’m re-elected, that’ll be the case again.”

Now, let’s leave aside the fact-checking on that one, because that’s not the issue. The important part: The only audience was on TV, and Biden had looked bad enough that people actually wondered whether our president was speaking to a studio audience that existed only in the fragile eggshell mind of Joseph Robinette Biden.

Related:
Could Hillary Clinton Replace Kamala Harris? It Could Be What Saves Biden, According to WaPo Columnist

Now, to be fair, a television audience is an audience, and that’s certainly a more charitable interpretation. In fact, it’s one we’d give by default to literally anyone else who’d said the same thing.

But this guy? Not so much. And nor was it the only moment of the night when the question of whether or not he thought there was an audience came up among those on social media.

Take his entrance, where he waved and said, “Hi folks, how are ya?” My impression was that he was doing this to the moderators and crew that were present, although others had doubts. By the end of the evening, I did, too:

Now, mind you, this was the first presidential debate since John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon in 1960 not to have a live, in-person audience — and that was at the behest of the Biden campaign, The New York Times noted, which was “seeking to avoid any cheering or booing that could derail the conversation.”

Yes. Because clearly, the issue was the MAGA rabblement derailing the rhetorical machine that is our 46th president:

However, my assumption is that Biden’s brain, such is what is left of it, was not playing tricks on him Thursday night and making him think there was a live debate audience. That’s an assumption.

In any other cycle — heck, in any other debate — I’d unfailingly think these individuals were being misleading by saying that the president was hallucinating people in the “audience.” On the other hand, nobody who watched Thursday’s trainwreck could pass a lie detector test and say they were absolutely sure about that.

No more talk about “cheap fakes” and misleading clips. No more talk about this president being sharp as a tack behind doors. No more “childhood stutter.” We didn’t know what Biden was saying most of the time, and he likely didn’t know, either.

This is a man in deep, visible, organic mental decline that is only going to get worse, and he wants four more years as the most powerful man in the free world. Any sane “audience,” real or imaginary, should deny him it.


A Note from Our Deputy Managing Editor:

 

“We don’t even know if an election will be held in 2024.” Those 12 words have been stuck in my head since I first read them. 

 

Former Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn recently made that comment to Floyd Brown, founder of The Western Journal. 

 

And if the leftists and the elites get their way, that’s exactly what will happen — no real election, no real choice for the Electoral College, and no real say for the American people. 

 

The Western Journal is fighting to keep that from happening, but we can’t do it alone.

 

We work tirelessly to expose the lying leftist media and the corrupt America-hating elites.

 

But Big Tech’s stranglehold is now so tight that without help from you, we will not be able to continue the fight. 

 

The 2024 election is literally the most important election for every living American. We have to unite and fight for our country, otherwise we will lose it. And if we lose the America we love in 2024, we’ll lose it for good. Can we count on you to help? 

 

With you we will be able to field journalists, do more investigative work, expose more corruption, and get desperately needed truth to millions of Americans. 

 

We can do this only with your help. Please don’t wait one minute. Donate right now.

 

Thank you for reading,

Josh Manning

Deputy Managing Editor

 

P.S. Please stand with us today.

 

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , , , ,
Share
C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014.
C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014. Aside from politics, he enjoys spending time with his wife, literature (especially British comic novels and modern Japanese lit), indie rock, coffee, Formula One and football (of both American and world varieties).
Birthplace
Morristown, New Jersey
Education
Catholic University of America
Languages Spoken
English, Spanish
Topics of Expertise
American Politics, World Politics, Culture




Conversation