Share
News

New York Times Op-Ed: End Criminal Cases Against Trump, the People Have Spoken

Share

The New York Times published an opinion piece calling for all the criminal cases being brought against Donald Trump to be dropped in light of his victory in this month’s election.

Thomas Goldstein — former appellate attorney, publisher of the SCOTUS blog, and lecturer at Harvard Law School — wrote a Nov. 15 article titled, “End the Criminal Cases Against Trump.”

“With the election now over, the courts have to decide quickly whether to move forward with the criminal cases against Donald Trump. Although this idea will pain my fellow Democrats, all of the cases should be abandoned,” he began.

Goldstein, who represented former Vice President Al Gore in the 2000 presidential election case Bush v. Gore, noted that Trump made the criminal prosecutions a central issue in his campaign and the people have spoken.

The Republican won the Electoral College vote 312 to 226, and the popular vote by approximately 76.8 million votes to Vice President Kamala Harris’ 74.3 million.

Goldstein then recounted that Trump still technically faces four criminal cases: two federal criminal and two state.

The Department of Justice has indicated that special counsel Jack Smith — the 2020 election interference and the classified documents cases — will not be proceeding.

If they are not completely wrapped by the end of the current administration, they certainly will be dropped during the next.

On Friday New York Judge Juan Merchan removed the sentencing hearing from the court calendar in Trump’s business records case by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg and is allowing the president-elect’s attorneys to file a motion to dismiss it.

Do you think Goldstein makes a good argument?

Finally, Fulton County, Georgia, District Attorney Fani Willis’ 2020 election interference case against Trump is currently at the state Court of Appeals. But the court issued an order Nov. 18 saying oral arguments were postponed until further notice, according to Newsweek.

Goldstein wrote concerning the New York and Georgia cases, “[T]he prosecutors’ legal theories were and are unusual, to say the least. Their premise is that financial shenanigans and political strong arming in hard-fought battles for the presidency are serious felonies that can be pursued by local prosecutors in local courts. But these are fundamentally federal, not state, concerns.”

“That doesn’t prove that they were brought for political reasons. But the Constitution trusts the judgment of the American people to decide whether the cases against Mr. Trump, as he has argued, were political and calculated to stop him from being elected,” he added.

Related:
Project 2025 Back in Play? Trump Team Using Demonized Report to Identify Potential Admin Hires: Report

Goldstein further argued, “For many Democrats, dismissing the cases feels profoundly wrong because they see them as the last chance to bring Mr. Trump to justice. In truth, support for the cases among many Democrats doesn’t seem to be based on confidence in the prosecutors’ legal theories and evidence. Instead, it seems to be driven by politics and hatred of Mr. Trump. That reinforces why they must be dismissed.”

The legal expert asked his fellow Democrats to imagine a world in which Republican state and local prosecutors went after Democratic presidential candidates. That is what will happen if the current litigation efforts were allowed to stand, Goldstein predicted.

He concluded, “[T]he Constitution isn’t concerned with preserving a couple of criminal cases. It is concerned with having a system of government that can hold our democracy together for centuries.”

The New York Times is certainly no friend of Trump, but it published a story anyway saying, for the sake of the country, the cases against the president-elect should end.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , ,
Share
Randy DeSoto has written more than 3,000 articles for The Western Journal since he began with the company in 2015. He is a graduate of West Point and Regent University School of Law. He is the author of the book "We Hold These Truths" and screenwriter of the political documentary "I Want Your Money."
Randy DeSoto wrote and was the assistant producer of the documentary film "I Want Your Money" about the perils of Big Government, comparing the presidencies of Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama. Randy is the author of the book "We Hold These Truths," which addresses how leaders have appealed to beliefs found in the Declaration of Independence at defining moments in our nation's history. He has been published in several political sites and newspapers.

Randy graduated from the United States Military Academy at West Point with a BS in political science and Regent University School of Law with a juris doctorate.
Birthplace
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Nationality
American
Honors/Awards
Graduated dean's list from West Point
Education
United States Military Academy at West Point, Regent University School of Law
Books Written
We Hold These Truths
Professional Memberships
Virginia and Pennsylvania state bars
Location
Phoenix, Arizona
Languages Spoken
English
Topics of Expertise
Politics, Entertainment, Faith




Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.

Conversation