Harsanyi: Don't Fall for the Democrats' Ginned-Up Social Security Scaremongering
Here are two snippets from Wednesday’s New York Times piece contending that Republicans have “embraced” plans to cut Social Security and Medicare:
“The fact that Republicans are openly talking about cutting the programs has galvanized Democrats in the final weeks of the midterm campaign.”
“Still, the fact that key Republicans are openly broaching spending cuts to Social Security and Medicare…”
Boy, it sounds like there’s a ton of chatter in Washington about cutting entitlements. And it’s about time we embraced reform. So, which brave “key Republicans” are “openly broaching” the idea of reforming Social Security and Medicare? We don’t know, because the author, Jim Tankersley, doesn’t offer a single quote from anyone in the GOP making that argument — not an elected official, not a candidate, not even some fringe backbencher spouting off.
How can one of the most prestigious newspapers in the country run a 1,500-word piece asserting that a major political party has been “openly talking” about a highly controversial policy position and not substantiate the claim with a single quote? That would be the first question of any competent editor.
Of course, as much as I wish it existed, there is no plan or campaign aimed at slashing or weaning us off entitlements. The entire ginned-up issue basically relies on a single line from Sen. Rick Scott’s “Save America” agenda, which Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell rejected as soon as it appeared. (You’ll find out about that in paragraph 13 of the Times story.)
In truth, Scott doesn’t even target Social Security or Medicare reform specifically, but rather supports an audit and renewal of all federal programs every five years. (The Times incorrectly says “every year.”) There is a strong case to be made that revisiting legislation every few years is far more democratic than compelling millions to live with antiquated economic ideas that were popularized during the Depression.
Not that any of it stops Tankersley from going on about how “several influential Republicans have signaled a new willingness to push for Medicare and Social Security spending cuts.” Several, huh? The hyperlink bolstering this assertion leads us to a more nuanced Bloomberg piece that details possible GOP efforts to use the debt ceiling as a negotiating tool to curb perpetual, massive auto-spending.
As we learn in paragraph 23 of the Times story, “Democrats and Republicans largely agree Congress will need to ensure the solvency of the programs in the decade to come. Spending for the programs is projected to balloon in the coming decade as more baby boomers retire.”
Among the ideas the Republican Study Committee brings to the table is gradually raising the retirement age for some workers due to higher life expectancy (with increased benefits). And Bloomberg quotes Rep. Lloyd Smucker saying we may need future reductions of benefits for wealthy Americans to save the program from insolvency.
But, again, the Bloomberg piece does not feature a single person proposing slashing Social Security or Medicare.
Whenever Democrats latch on to some new scaremongering effort — “saving democracy” or “voting rights” — the establishment media instantly takes up the issue, often ham-fistedly backfilling the accusations with alleged reporting.
Though the Times piece does not offer any Republicans talking about cutting Social Security, it does give President Joe Biden, former President Barack Obama and other Democrats the space to go off on this imaginary threat.
“You’ve been paying into Social Security your whole life. You earned it. Now these guys want to take it away,” Biden is quoted as saying during a visit to Hallandale Beach, Florida. “Who in the hell do they think they are? Excuse my language.” Obama, who never shies away from flogging a strawman to within inches of its life, says that American retirees “had long hours and sore backs and bad knees to get that Social Security.”
As Obama — though, perhaps, not Biden — knows very well, there is no proposal from Republicans to take Social Security from those who’ve paid in.
Not even George W. Bush, the last Republican to campaign on reforming the untenable entitlement infrastructure, has ever proposed taking a penny from anyone who paid into it. That was always a lie. Even those reforms would only have allowed — not compelled — new participants to divert a portion of their tax dollars to private retirement accounts and opt out of an unsustainable, state-run Ponzi scheme that brought them a paltry 1 percent return on their “investment.”
Don’t worry, though, no one is going to reform entitlements. It’s a politically toxic issue that can be easily demagogued.
© 2022 CREATORS.COM
The views expressed in this opinion article are those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by the owners of this website. If you are interested in contributing an Op-Ed to The Western Journal, you can learn about our submission guidelines and process here.
Truth and Accuracy
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.
Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.
