Share
Commentary

Does This Yale Study Explain Why Ocasio-Cortez Used a Bizarre Accent To Talk to a Room of Black People?

Share

A Yale study suggests that liberals change their speech when they’re addressing black audiences, which could explain why Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez spoke in a bizarre accent while speaking to a predominantly black audience.

Ocasio-Cortez was widely criticized after she broke out a bizarre Southern drawl during a speech to the National Action Network convention Friday.

“I’m proud to be a bartender. Ain’t nothing wrong with that,” Ocasio-Cortez said.

The far-left representative also told the mainly black audience that there’s nothing wrong with folding clothes, cooking, and driving buses.

The entire clip is hard to watch, and it’s painfully obvious that Ocasio-Cortez is patronizing the audience.

Ocasio-Cortez tried to explain that she used the accent because she “grew up in a distinct linguistic culture” and had to learn to “navigate” different class environments.

In other words, the representative claimed she was simply “navigating” a different environment when she used a different accent to speak to a black audience.

But a look at some Ocasio-Cortez speeches during the Supreme Court confirmation hearings for now-Justice Brett Kavanaugh and the January Women’s March doesn’t really support her claims.

A study published in September from Yale Professor Cydney Dupree might explain the situation more bluntly: Dupree found white liberals change their language when speaking to black audiences.

While Ocasio-Cortez does not identify as “white,” the same principle might apply in this scenario.

The Yale study found that “white liberals tend to downplay their own verbal competence in exchanges with racial minorities,” according to Yale Insights.

Related:
Priceless: Dem Rep Squirms, Sweats as He's Forced to Watch His Own Past Comments About Hunter Pardon
Do you think Ocasio-Cortez's accent was insulting to blacks?

“Democratic candidates used fewer competence-related words in speeches delivered to mostly minority audiences than they did in speeches delivered to mostly white audiences,” the study found.

Not surprisingly, the study did not find the same trend among conservatives — it’s apparently only liberals who patronize black people by changing their language.

“The difference wasn’t statistically significant in speeches by Republican candidates,” Dupree told Yale Insights.

It’s incredible how liberals claim to represent the concerns of black voters, but they consistently use the most patronizing and insulting language toward black people.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , , ,
Share
Malachi Bailey is a writer from Ohio with a background in history, education and philosophy. He has led multiple conservative groups and is dedicated to the principles of free speech, privacy and peace.
Malachi Bailey is a writer from Ohio with a passion for free speech, privacy and peace. He graduated from the College of Wooster with a B.A. in History. While at Wooster, he served as the Treasurer for the Wooster Conservatives and the Vice President for the Young Americans for Liberty.
Topics of Expertise
Politics, History




Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.

Conversation