Biden's Abortion Funding Gimmick Epically Fails as Not 1 State Takes Him Up on His Offer
The Biden administration offered to use Medicaid funding to pay for abortion-related travel expenses, but states are not taking him up on the money, according to Politico.
President Joe Biden issued an executive order in August instructing the Department of Health and Human Services to have Medicaid cover costs for women who want to cross state lines to have abortions.
Not one state pursued the Medicaid funding, according to Politico.
“We are trying to use every lever we have available to us to think about every possible solution there might be, however narrow,” an anonymous senior health official told Politico.
“We’ve said, ‘Open door, you’ve got an idea, come to us,’ because we’re trying to help everyone we can, in any way we can. But the reality is there is no silver bullet here.”
Yesterday, following my Executive Order, HHS released new guidance to ensure health care providers across the country know their obligation under federal law to provide life- or health-saving abortion services in emergency situations—regardless of their state’s abortion laws.
— President Biden (@POTUS) July 12, 2022
Among 24 states where abortion is generally legal, 10 have not decided if they will apply for the special Medicaid funding, two are waiting for further guidance, one is not applying and 11 did not respond to questions about the initiative, according to Politico.
The application process is complicated and time consuming, and the number of women who would actually receive the funding would be small, a Connecticut Department of Social Services commissioner told Politico.
The Hyde Amendment prevents federal funding for abortions except to protect the life of the mother and in cases of rape and incest, making it unlikely that funding could support abortion-related expenses outside these rare cases, according to Politico. Approximately 1 percent of abortions are sought due to being a victim of rape, and less than 0.5 percent are due to incest; women would presumably not need to cross state lines to have abortions in life-threatening instances since no state abortion restriction bans the procedure when the mother’s life is at stake, according to USA Today.
“The number of women that will be impacted in that specific circumstance … would be a pretty small number,” Deidre Gifford, commissioner for Connecticut’s Department of Social Services, told Politico.
The HHS and the White House did not respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.
Content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of the DCNF’s original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
A version of this article appeared on the Daily Caller News Foundation website.
Truth and Accuracy
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.
Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.
