Share
News

Biden-Harris DOJ Files New Indictment Against Trump

Share

The Biden-Harris administration’s Department of Justice filed a superseding indictment against former President Donald Trump on Tuesday accusing him of interference in the 2020 election.

The 36-page indictment filed by special counsel Jack Smith includes four criminal charges: conspiracy to defraud the United States regarding the results of the presidential election, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding with regards to the Electoral College certification on Jan. 6, 2021, obstructing an official proceeding and conspiracy against voting rights.

Politico reported that these were the same four charges Smith brought in his original 45-page indictment in August 2023; however, the DOJ has reworked the charging document in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling in July that presidents have immunity for official acts taken while in office.

“The superseding indictment, which was presented to a new grand jury that had not previously heard evidence in this case, reflects the Government’s efforts to respect and implement the Supreme Court’s holdings and remand instructions,” Smith’s team wrote in an accompanying court filing with the indictment.

The Court held that Trump does not have immunity for private acts taken as president.

Trending:
Independent Journalists Make Disturbing Findings in Springfield, Ohio: 'We Need Somebody to Do Something'

Trump’s legal team has argued that in his role as chief executive he was acting within his official capacity in seeking to ensure the integrity of the 2020 election.

“The new indictment underscores that Mike Pence was not only vice president, but also Trump’s ‘running mate’ when Trump pressured Pence to block the certification of the election results. It notes that Trump’s rally at the Ellipse on Jan. 6, 2021, was ‘privately-funded’ and ‘privately-organized.’ And it stresses that Trump often used his Twitter account for ‘personal purposes.’” Politico noted.

Last month, George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley described the Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision in the presidential immunity case as “very good” for Trump.

“In reading through this opinion, I can’t see how this doesn’t induce cardiac arrest for the special counsel,” Turley told Fox News.

Are the indictments against Trump politically motivated?

“Here the court is imposing a very significant burden on Jack Smith when this goes back to the judge,” he added. “The court here is giving much more clear lines than some people expected.”

Chief Justice John Robert wrote in the majority opinion, the president “is entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts. There is no immunity for unofficial acts.”

“The indictment’s allegations that Trump attempted to pressure the Vice President to take particular acts in connection with his role at the certification proceeding thus involve official conduct, and Trump is at least presumptively immune from prosecution for such conduct,” the Court said.

Trump wanted the state legislatures in some states with close election results to conduct a further review for fraud. He argued that mass mail-in voting adopted in some states — like Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin and Michigan — during the pandemic without legislative approval potentially undermined the integrity of the election.

Turley expounded, “This case is going to have to go back to the district court, which is going to have to try to thread this needle to determine what in the case would not fall under these protections.”

Related:
Bodycam Footage: Fani Willis Shows Up to Her Daughter's Arrest with Nathan Wade

NPR reported, Smith has been consulting with DOJ officials for weeks about how to go forward with their case against Trump in light of the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling.

Trump has denied all wrong-doing.

NPR noted that the updated case will not be tried before the election, and if Trump were to win in November, the charges would likely be dropped by the new administration’s leadership at the DOJ.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , , , , ,
Share
Randy DeSoto has written more than 3,000 articles for The Western Journal since he began with the company in 2015. He is a graduate of West Point and Regent University School of Law. He is the author of the book "We Hold These Truths" and screenwriter of the political documentary "I Want Your Money."
Randy DeSoto wrote and was the assistant producer of the documentary film "I Want Your Money" about the perils of Big Government, comparing the presidencies of Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama. Randy is the author of the book "We Hold These Truths," which addresses how leaders have appealed to beliefs found in the Declaration of Independence at defining moments in our nation's history. He has been published in several political sites and newspapers.

Randy graduated from the United States Military Academy at West Point with a BS in political science and Regent University School of Law with a juris doctorate.
Birthplace
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Nationality
American
Honors/Awards
Graduated dean's list from West Point
Education
United States Military Academy at West Point, Regent University School of Law
Books Written
We Hold These Truths
Professional Memberships
Virginia and Pennsylvania state bars
Location
Phoenix, Arizona
Languages Spoken
English
Topics of Expertise
Politics, Entertainment, Faith




Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.

Conversation