McCloskey Lawyer Describes Trump's Support as Couple Pleads Not Guilty
A St. Louis couple who held guns while protesters trespassed on their private street pleaded not guilty to two felony charges at a brief hearing on Wednesday.
Mark and Patricia McCloskey, who are both attorneys in their early 60s, were indicted by a St. Louis grand jury last week on charges of unlawful use of a weapon and tampering with evidence. They will appear in court again Oct. 28.
St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner originally filed the weapons charge in July.
The grand jury added the evidence tampering charge. The indictment states that a semiautomatic pistol was altered in a way that “obstructed the prosecution of Patricia McCloskey” on the weapons charge.
The McCloskeys have blamed the “leftist” Democrats in St. Louis for their plight. They have received support from President Donald Trump and spoke during the opening night of the Republican National Convention.
In fact, the McCloskeys’ attorney, Joel Schwartz, indicated that Trump remains interested in the case.
“They have spoken with the president,” Schwartz said after the hearing. “The president contacts them semi-frequently.”
Missouri Gov. Mike Parson has defended the couple’s right to protect their home and said he will pardon them if they are convicted.
The protest on June 28 came in the midst of nationwide demonstrations and riots that followed the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis.
A few hundred marchers were on their way to St. Louis Mayor Lyda Krewson’s home when they veered onto a private street in St. Louis’ posh Central West End.
The McCloskeys claimed the protesters not only ignored a “No Trespassing” sign but also broke down an iron gate. Protest leaders said they did not damage the gate.
Mark McCloskey emerged from his home armed with an AR-15 rifle and Patricia McCloskey came out with a semiautomatic handgun. It wasn’t immediately clear if that gun was the same one that was the subject of the evidence tampering charge.
Cellphone video captured the tense confrontation between the McCloskeys and protesters. No shots were fired and no one was hurt.
Gardner, a Democrat, said the display of guns risked violence.
A police probable cause statement said protesters feared “being injured due to Patricia McCloskey’s finger being on the trigger, coupled with her excited demeanor.”
Schwartz called the charges a “travesty” and a “political prosecution,” citing Gardner’s ads in her successful Democratic primary campaign in August in which she referenced the case.
Schwartz said he will ask that Gardner’s office be disqualified so another prosecutor can take over the case “to give it a fresh look.”
Gardner’s spokeswoman did not immediately respond to an email message seeking comment.
Nine people involved in the protest were charged with misdemeanor trespassing, but the city counselor’s office later dropped the charges. The city counselor’s office handles lesser crimes and is not affiliated with the circuit attorney’s office.
Mark McCloskey, after a brief court hearing last week, expressed anger that he and his wife faced criminal charges while those who trespassed on his property did not.
“Every single human being that was in front of my house was a criminal trespasser,” McCloskey said.
“They broke down our gate. They trespassed on our property. Not a single one of those people is now charged with anything. We’re charged with felonies that could cost us four years of our lives and our law licenses.”
The Western Journal has reviewed this Associated Press story and may have altered it prior to publication to ensure that it meets our editorial standards.
Truth and Accuracy
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.
Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.
