Clinton-Appointed Judge Makes It Easier To Pay for Abortions Under Obamacare
A federal judge in Baltimore on Friday struck down a Trump administration rule that pro-abortion advocates said restricted access but officials defended as merely following the law.
The decision by U.S. District Judge Catherine C. Blake affects women covered under the Obama-era Affordable Care Act.
The ruling hinged on the question of whether a congressional requirement that insurers collect a “separate payment” for abortion coverage meant the companies also have to send their policyholders an additional bill, as the Trump administration wanted to require.
The judge’s ruling means insurers can continue to make the charge for abortion a line item on their monthly bill, or just give policyholders notice that it’s included.
Federal law has long barred the use of taxpayer funds to pay for abortion in most cases.
To secure the support of Democratic lawmakers opposed to abortion for his health care law, former President Barack Obama agreed that insurers who covered the procedure would have to collect a separate payment and strictly segregate those funds from taxpayer subsidies for medical coverage.
But the law did not spell out the billing method insurers had to follow, and the Obama administration left it up to the companies to decide whether to list the cost of abortions on the main bill, or bill separately.
Abortion opponents said separate bills should be mandatory because that would clearly reflect the intent of the law. The Trump administration agreed.
Last year the Department of Health and Human Services proposed that separate bills would be required.
Planned Parenthood of Maryland sued on behalf of several women, supported by the American Civil Liberties Union.
They argued that the requirement to send separate bills could prompt insurers to drop coverage for abortions and would create confusion for policyholders.
Insurers argued that they were already complying with the law’s requirement to keep premiums for abortion coverage strictly separate, and that mandating separate bills would increase health care costs and complicate their business operations.
Judge Blake sided with the plaintiffs, underlining that the health care law itself called for “separate payments” but did not address how to collect.
“HHS has simply stated that it believes that [its] interpretation is reasonable and more appropriate, without explaining why,” the judge wrote.
It was the second setback in recent weeks for abortion opponents. In a much bigger case, a divided Supreme Court struck down a Louisiana law requiring doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals.
HHS said it is reviewing the ruling and would have no comment.
Planned Parenthood celebrated. “Today is a huge victory for the people who need and deserve access to safe, legal abortion,” Alexis McGill Johnson, the group’s president, said in a statement.
Blake was nominated by former President Bill Clinton.
The Western Journal has reviewed this Associated Press story and may have altered it prior to publication to ensure that it meets our editorial standards.
Truth and Accuracy
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.
Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.
